Verdict resilience · the draw of chance
Does the verdict survive a different draw?
Who Owns the Labs as decided by 4 advisors, re-deliberated on seeds 2406–2429, and once more with each advisor removed in turn. The court is the same one the case page seats by default.
Stability
100%
24 of 24 swept seeds
settledModal verdict
A public-interest trust
the only option to win any seed
Flips
0
adjacent seeds that disagree · longest unbroken run 24
Inside the close band
8
seeds with margin at or under 0.25 · margins 0.056–0.376, mean 0.275 · confidence 44%
The draw, seed by seed
One square per seed, in order, coloured by the option that won it. A single unbroken block is a verdict the tie-break never touched; a patchwork is a case where the answer partly depends on where you happen to start the stream.
- A public-interest trust24/24
- Keep ownership, pool the compute0/24
- Licence it, do not nationalise it0/24
- Leave ownership alone0/24
Every option, seed by seed
| option | wins | share | first seed |
|---|---|---|---|
| A public-interest trustmodal | 24 | 100.0% | 2406 |
| Keep ownership, pool the compute | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Licence it, do not nationalise it | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| Leave ownership alone | 0 | 0.0% | — |
Which axis decided the draws
The deciding axis reported by each of the 24 verdicts, most frequent first. Where one axis towers over the rest, the disagreement never really moved.
- Welfare24/24
- Rights0/24
- Virtue0/24
- Care0/24
- Justice0/24
- Agency0/24
Who is load-bearing?
No single advisor flips this verdict: remove any one and the same option still wins. With everyone seated, the court rules A public-interest trust with margin 0.318 and confidence 37%.
- Jeremy Benthamstandswithout them: A public-interest trustΔmargin +0.162
- Desmond Tutustandswithout them: A public-interest trustΔmargin +0.115
- Immanuel Kantstandswithout them: A public-interest trustΔmargin +0.058
- Epictetusstandswithout them: A public-interest trustΔmargin −0.017